MA Social Research module
This short course reflects the strong research and professional identities linked with disability which often characterise the social identities of workers in the field, leading them to seek out disability-oriented perspectives (Lewis and Crisp 2004). This has been reflected in texts which have taken a disability-specific orientation to research (e.g. Armstrong and Moore 2004; Barnes and Mercer 1997; Moore et al 1998). In due course the proposed course could lend itself to an updated and more comprehensive version of such texts reflecting also, for example, internet developments in this field.
The course will both unpick the methodological implications of some of the debates around the nature and interpretation of ‘disability’ and also scrutinise some of the practical issues of ‘method’ when researching disability. In outline, the following foci are envisaged (anticipating approximately one day on each with an emphasis on seminar rather than formal lecture format):
By the end of the module you will be able to identify:
(i) Context and issues:
Conceptualisation of disability and impact on research epistemology;
Diverse approaches to research in the area of disability, including participatory and emancipatory approaches;
The nascent 'disability history' agenda;
The politicisation of SEN/ disability and policy oriented research;
Evaluation research in disability or special needs
(ii) Ethics and methods:
Ethical issues e.g. gaining informed consent with participants having limited communication skills;
Differentiating access and response modes for participants with cognitive or sensory impairments (including arts and web based methods);
Child voice in the context of children with disabilities or special needs
Dissemination: access and format issues; involving people with disabilities in dissemination
3,000 word assignment.
PART 1: A research proposal for a piece of disability focused research which addresses the concepetualisation of disability, power relationships and participation, methods, ethics and dissemination (approx 2000 words).
PART 2: A brief reflective commentary on the proposal reflecting on 1. the researcher’s standpoint (e.g. in relation to own identity, discipline and professional background) and 2. anticipated difficulties to be addressed in the conduct of the study (1000 words).