From U-turn to U-turn: did pro-Brexit politicians mislead the British public?

“In a campaign led by scaremongering and populist paranoia on both sides, it seems that some political elites may have misled the British public over what Brexit means or the implications of such a vote.”

Hide

The result of the UK's referendum on EU membership produced a narrow victory for those wanting to leave the European Union, with 52% voting to leave and 48% voting to remain. The stock markets reacted with a mixture of shock and fear, the value of the pound dropped to its lowest level since 1985 in the day after the referendum and global affairs were initially shaken up. Yet domestically, key Brexiters have been unsure of what to do, or are backtracking from their pre-referendum positions.

However, one surprising change of position is that of Gisela Stuart’s sudden concern about protecting the status of EU nationals living in Britain.

Even though the Birmingham Labour MP was one of the key Labour figures supporting Brexit, she now seems concerned about what will happen to EU migrants (it should be noted that Gisela Stuart is herself an EU migrant who moved here from Germany in 1974). It is questionable why the Edgbaston MP did not think of the potential repercussions on migrants living in the UK, before she backed the campaign to Leave. Unsurprisingly, in the weeks after the vote a number of far-right groups and individuals started attacking foreigners, minorities and cultural centres in an unprecedented rise of reported hate crime in the UK.

As Karl Marx once said “Like the sorcerer, who is no longer able to control the powers of the nether world whom he has called up by her spells”, Gisela Stuart is to lead a research project looking at how the rights of EU migrants can be protected once the UK leaves the European Union.

However, this seems futile if we do not know what Brexit means. A number of possible scenarios have been floating around, ranging from membership to the European Economic Area (which does not allow restriction on free movement of people as in the EU), membership to the World Trade Organisation, a complete EU exit or even an EU membership with some guarantees on immigration. In addition, Theresa May has refused to declare that the rights of Europeans living in Britain are guaranteed without a reciprocal agreement by the EU. This means that until the British government and the EU reach an agreement, the status of EU nationals currently living in the UK will remain in limbo.

Moreover, politically, Stuart’s late concern about the status and rights of EU nationals living in the UK seems to mark another U-turn on the Brexit agenda. The Labour MP cannot have been oblivious to the fact that a large number of her fellow Brexit proponents were either coming from the far-right, such as UKIP or the Tory nationalist camp, where immigration was perceived as the ‘number one’ issue for Britain. Stuart was either naïve or irresponsible to assume that EU nationals would not be affected by a pro-Brexit result given that immigration was the campaign’s main reason to leave the EU altogether.

Ironically, if one key group should feel betrayed by Gisela Stuart’s sudden interest in safeguarding the rights of EU nationals living in Britain, it should be those who voted to leave the EU. They were led to believe that immigration would be significantly reduced, with some recent EU migrants likely to return home.

In a campaign that was led by scaremongering and populist paranoia on both sides, it seems that some political elites may have misled the British public over what Brexit means or the implications of such a vote. However, there are still a lot of issues that need to be decided and that political mobilisation, as well as campaigning should continue as we move towards Brexit. The post referendum agenda should not be driven by political chameleons that do not have a clear and consistent agenda based on facts and evidence. This issue is too serious to be left to political spin.

Have your say...

Feedback
  • Farhat Khanim
    External
    1. At 2:45PM on 01 September 2016, Farhat Khanim wrote

    Your article is both interesting and further argument for the invalidity of the EU Referendum. The Referendum was an opinion poll, not a legally-binding vote, so why has our Government responded the way it did? We would not ask Mrs Bloggs the electrician to advise us on how to perform a heart-bypass operation nor would we ask the local supermarket checkout assistant to predict future financial outcomes on company merger policy for a large multi-national company. Therefore, how can we expect the general public (including myself) to make an educated decision on whether the UK should remain as a member of the EU, a subject which is far more complicated than any of us can possibly imagine or hope to understand. The Leave campaign used propaganda, inaccurate facts and dishonest claims to fuel fears about "immigrants taking away jobs and resources", leading to an uprising of hate and racist attacks which should never be tolerated or accepted. Watching Nigel Farage speaking at the European Parliament is enough to tell us everything we needed to know about the Leave campaign. Likewise, the Remain campaign is not blameless. It singularly failed to highlight the benefits of being part of the EU.

    If we voted again tomorrow knowing at least some of the truth about the Leave campaign, and included 16-17 year old's who represent the generation whose future we are talking about, what would the result be then? Most likely the opposite situation from the current crisis we find ourselves in.

    As scientists in an academic setting where we work with people from all over the world, we understand the importance of collaboration. We acknowledge and understand that we should judge people by their abilities not their nationality (#ScienceHasNoBorders).

    This is not a just debate about whether we will be stronger economically, but a much larger question; do we want to be part of a larger world community that embraces and celebrates differences working together to make a better world, or do we want to be hypocritical isolationists that demand all the benefits and none of the responsibilities of a community we do not want to be a part of.

  • Francis Lankester PhD
    External
    2. At 5:04PM on 01 September 2016, Francis Lankester PhD wrote

    UKIP is not a Far-Right party and the Brexit supporting Tories (with 60% of Conservative voters in the referendum) are simply Conservatives and the foundation of Conservatism is belief and confidence in the nation state. Control of borders and citizenship are the prerogatives of the nation's citizens.

    Gisela Stuart is not an EU migrant, she is simply British.

    It's a pity that Birmingham University, like many HE institutions, still stigmatizes the majority of British people who reject trans-nationalism and the end of nations. The whole relationship between the UK and the EU (previously the 'Common Market) was a lie from the start, with the "it's only tidying up and nothing essential has changed" narrative used again and again from the Single European Act, Maastricht etc. In the end a majority finally saw through this and that DC had gained nothing worthwhile by renegotiation.

  • 88952634
    External
    3. At 10:43AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    4. At 10:43AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    5. At 10:44AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    6. At 10:44AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    7. At 10:44AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    8. At 10:44AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    9. At 10:44AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    10. At 10:44AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    11. At 10:44AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    12. At 10:44AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    13. At 10:44AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    14. At 10:44AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    15. At 10:44AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    16. At 10:44AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    17. At 10:45AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    18. At 10:45AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    19. At 10:45AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    20. At 10:45AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    21. At 10:45AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    22. At 10:45AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    23. At 10:45AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    24. At 10:45AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634'`"(
    External
    25. At 10:45AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634-0
    External
    26. At 10:45AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634s3
    External
    27. At 10:45AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634'+'
    External
    28. At 10:46AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634'
    External
    29. At 10:46AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634'||'
    External
    30. At 10:46AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634'
    External
    31. At 10:46AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    32. At 10:47AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    33. At 10:47AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    34. At 10:47AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    35. At 10:47AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    36. At 10:47AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    37. At 10:47AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    38. At 10:47AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    39. At 10:47AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    40. At 10:47AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    41. At 10:47AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    42. At 10:48AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    43. At 10:48AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    44. At 10:48AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    45. At 10:48AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    46. At 10:48AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    47. At 10:48AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    48. At 10:48AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    49. At 10:48AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    50. At 10:48AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    51. At 10:48AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    52. At 10:48AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    53. At 10:48AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    54. At 10:49AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    55. At 10:49AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    56. At 10:49AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    57. At 10:49AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    58. At 10:49AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    59. At 10:49AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634

  • 88952634
    External
    60. At 10:49AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634'`"(

  • 88952634
    External
    61. At 10:49AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634-0

  • 88952634
    External
    62. At 10:49AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634s3

  • 88952634
    External
    63. At 10:49AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634'+'

  • 88952634
    External
    64. At 10:49AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634'

  • 88952634
    External
    65. At 10:49AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634'||'

  • 88952634
    External
    66. At 10:49AM on 11 December 2016, wrote

    88952634'

  • LOKNIM
    External
    67. At 4:15AM on 20 May 2017, wrote
Add Your Feedback