My main research is on the compatibility of physicalism and free agency. In my thesis, I am defending a new version of Peter Van Inwagen's Consequence Argument directed at proving the incompatibility between free agency and physicalism. Here, I am defending the premises that (if physicalism is true) I am powerless to change/affect microphysical events and states, and the laws of nature, and therefore (if physicalism is true) I have no free will. In this process, I discuss subjects such as causal and nomological closure, views of action/mental causation, the relationship between metaphysical necessity and agency, the neuroscientific data regarding free agency, the concept of physicalism, David Albert and Barry Loewer's Mentaculus Theory, and free will.