Researchers in the School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences have discovered that bats living in a city are less likely to move from tree to tree in brightly lit areas, according to research published online on 5 June 2015 in the journal Global Change Biology.
To maintain high biodiversity in cities, wildlife must be able to move between patches of habitat, which are often separated by paved surfaces, buildings and roads. The bats studied in this experiment emerge in the evening from their roosts, often within residential housing areas, to feed on small insects in gardens, streams and other green spaces. To reach these feeding areas they often “commute” along lines of trees, which are thought to provide protection from predators and high winds.
The researchers, along with colleagues from Lancaster University, were studying the impact of artificial light on the bat species, Pipistrellus pipistrellus (the Common pipistrelle), that is found in many parts of UK cities. They wanted to find out whether the bats’ crossing behaviour was affected by the distance between trees and the brightness of lighting within the intervening gap. They found that the bats crossed via the darker parts of the gaps, but with sufficient lighting these gaps became barriers to movement. Importantly, this barrier effect varied with the width of the gap in the tree line - bats would tolerate strong lighting in narrow gaps, but even low levels of lighting in larger gaps was enough to stop them crossing.
James Hale, from the University of Birmingham’s School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, who led the study, said: ‘The ability to freely move around is key to individual bat fitness and resilience of the broader bat population. Intensification and expansion of lighting due to the availability of cheaper and more energy efficient lighting technologies could prove a real problem for bats as they move around a city. Understanding the factors that affect movement between habitat patches is therefore important for urban species survival and conservation. Our models predict that movement would be most restricted in the urban centre, which might explain why even this common species of bat is rarely found in intensively developed areas.’
He continued: ‘We have focussed our study on the Common pipistrelle, but the flight behaviour of several other bat species may be influenced by artificial lighting. More research is now needed to explore the potential disruption of movement for other species.’
Gemma Davies of Lancaster University’s Environment Centre, a co-author on the study, said: ‘We used Geographic Information Systems to combine data about the illumination from artificial lights, with the distance from trees, to predict the landscape resistance to bat movement. The logical next step for this research would be to feed these findings into the town and city planning process, by identifying areas where bat populations are low and strategically dimming or shielding street lamps and narrowing gaps in the local tree networks.’