Figures published in a new book explore public perception of charities and show how attitudes have changed since 1991.
In comparing public responses to the original British Social Attitudes Survey, to the same questions in 2015, the authors believe that while there are changes in the expectations for priorities in the sector, negative perceptions of charity have barely shifted at all.
‘The Logic of Charity: Great Expectations in Hard Times’ by Professor John Mohan of the University of Birmingham and Dr Beth Breeze of the University of Kent was published this month by Palgrave MacMillan, and covers a number of topics on the nature and understanding of charity in modern society.
Dr Beth Breeze explained, “Charities have been subject to vigorous criticism in 2015. Some of this is viewed (perhaps unfairly) as being of their own making – notably in relation to fundraising tactics – but other criticisms are more ideologically motivated, including comments on high salaries, ‘excessive’ reliance on public funding, and the employment of former Labour party advisers in senior charity roles. But it is important to understand what the general public think, and indeed how have their attitudes changed over time?”
Professor John Mohan said, “Levels of charitable giving have shown considerable stability, suggesting that there is sustained popular support for donating. Long-run trends show that the proportion of households giving to charity, and the amounts they give, fluctuate very little – and American data shows that this is true for most of the 20th century.”
The data suggested a greater willingness to place the burden for meeting social needs on charities. In 1991, 60% of respondents agreed that it was “not everyone’s responsibility to give what they can to charities”; by 2015, 48% agreed with this proposition.”
The data also displayed signs that the public do not wish excessive demands to be placed on charities. In 1991, 28% of the population agreed or strongly agreed that “people should look after themselves and not rely on charities”; the figure was 52% in 2015.
There were also changes in the public perception of charitable priorities.
In 1991, a 56% agreed that “we should support charities which benefited people in Britain rather than people overseas” and the figure had barely changed by 2015, only reaching 58%.
When asked about attitudes to responsibility for meeting needs, and whether government or charity should foot the bill, a more complex picture emerged.
In 1991 29% of respondents considered that “food aid to poor countries” should be entirely or mainly the responsibility of government, and a similar number (30%) believed this responsibility should be entirely or mainly a function of charity.
But in 2015, 19% of respondents thought that this was a government matter, whilst 58% believe that such assistance should come entirely or mainly from charity.
There is still strong support for government responsibility in relation to two core areas of welfare provision: health care (represented in the survey by a question about “paying for kidney machines”) and housing for homeless people – but there has also been a shift in favour of viewing these expenditures as a shared responsibility between government and voluntary initiative.
Professor John Mohan added, “The expectation, therefore, is that as the state withdraws, the public expects charitable organisations to take on more responsibilities. But do the public feel that charities are up to the job? Our data points to some difficulties in this regard, as it appears that some negative perceptions of charity have barely shifted at all.”
In 1991, 77% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that “there are so many charities that it is difficult to decide which to give to” and that figure has actually increased slightly to 81% by 2015.
Likewise the proportion who agreed that “most charities are wasteful in their use of funds” had gone up from 36% to 39%, despite ever-increasing efforts on the part of charities to measure their impacts and communicate them more effectively. These figures suggest that the message is not getting through.
Notes to editors
For interview requests, the full data or for more information, please contact Luke Harrison, Media Relations Manager, University of Birmingham on +44 (0)121 414 5134.
For out of hours media enquiries please call: +44 (0) 7789 921 165
J. Mohan & B. Breeze ‘The Logic of Charity: Great Expectations in Hard Times’, published by Palgrave MacMillan in December 2015: http://www.palgrave.com/page/detail/the-logic-of-charity-john-mohan/?sf1=barcode&st1=9781137522658