General Election 2024: The Conservative homicide sentencing policy ignores prison overcrowding

John Child, Professor of Criminal Law, explains some of the more controversial aspects of the Conservative's pledges on homicide sentencing.

Gavel being banged.

The two parts of this policy should be considered separately. On homicide law reform, the policy seems to be (a rather belated) acceptance of the Law Commission recommendations from its 2006 report Murder, Manslaughter and Infanticide; though first-degree murder is narrowed to intentional killing only. The policy here is well-tested and has received broad support from academic and policy audiences. Indeed, there is no reason (outside of election time) that this should separate the major parties. 

The recommendations on sentencing are more controversial, not least because of the current problems with prison overcrowding (i.e. all parties should be careful about increasing prison sentences without considering the future impacts and capacity implications). The focus on domestic homicide cases follows a review from Clare Wade KC, in which concerns are raised about the sentencing of domestic abusers who kill their victims. Action on sentencing may well be justified in light of this review, though care must be taken to remain targeted: similar increased sentences may not be justified in all domestic homicides, e.g. in cases where a victim of abuse kills their abuser.

Notes for editors

  • For media inquiries please contact Ellie Hail, Communications Officer, University of Birmingham on +44 (0)7966 311 409. Out-of-hours, please call +44 (0) 121 414 2772.

  • The University of Birmingham is ranked amongst the world’s top 100 institutions. Its work brings people from across the world to Birmingham, including researchers, teachers and more than 8,000 international students from over 150 countries.