Microbeads to combat infection show promise in burn wound simulations

Computer simulations of microscopic, protein-coated beads that block bacteria from binding to host cells suggest that the microbeads could help reduce or eliminate bacterial infections in burn wounds. Dr Paul Roberts from the University of Birmingham’s School of Mathematics, UK., and colleagues present these new findings, funded by the BBSRC, in the journal PLOS Computational Biology.

The microbeads were developed several years ago as a potential alternative to antibiotics, which are difficult to innovate quickly enough to keep up with the rapid emergence of bacterial strains that are resistant to existing drugs. The tiny plastic spheres are coated with the same protein used by many bacteria to bind host cells. Thus, they compete with bacteria for binding sites, physically keeping them from attaching to host cells.

Previous laboratory research has demonstrated the potential of the microbeads to treat infections in burn wounds in rats. To further explore this potential, Dr Roberts and colleagues developed a mathematical model that simulates microbead treatment of rats with burn wounds infected by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a bacterium that often infects burn wounds in humans.

Diagram showing how anti-adhesion therapy combats bacterial colonisation of burn wounds
Diagram illustrating how anti-adhesion therapy combats bacterial colonisation of burn wounds

The researchers ran computer simulations for a range of parameter values representing different infection scenarios and microbead treatment strategies. This enabled them to explore which conditions allow for effective microbead treatment and how to refine microbead treatment to maximize its anti-bacterial power.

The simulations showed that microbead treatment is unlikely to be effective on its own, but when combined with a technique called debridement, it could significantly reduce or eliminate infection. Debridement is a method of cleansing a burn wound with a cloth and is already used regularly to treat burn wounds in humans.

Our results also suggest that these microbeads could be used to complement traditional antibiotic drugs,’ Dr Paul Roberts says. ‘In theory, this would allow us to eliminate bacterial infections more rapidly, reducing the quantity of antibiotics used and hence lessening the chances that bacteria will develop resistance to them.’

Next, the model results will be tested in laboratory experiments to determine if a combined microbead-debridement treatment is as effective as predicted. Meanwhile, Dr Roberts and colleagues are developing more sophisticated mathematical models in order to explore the best ways to combine microbeads and debridement with traditional antibiotic treatment.


Notes to Editors

In your coverage please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS Computational Biology 
Citation: Roberts PA, Huebinger RM, Keen E, Krachler A-M, Jabbari S (2018) Predictive modelling of a novel anti-adhesion therapy to combat bacterial colonisation of burn wounds. PLoS Comput Biol 14(5): e1006071. 

Image Caption:
Diagrams showing the burn wound geometry (left) and a cartoon representation of the mathematical model (right). Host cells are covered by a liquid layer known as the exudate, which is itself covered by dead (necrotic) tissue, except in the region of the excision where the exudate is exposed to the air. Bacteria and inhibitors exist in one of two states: free in the exudate or bound to the host cells, and can transition between these states by binding to and unbinding from the host cells. Both free and bound bacteria can divide; daughters of free bacteria enter the exudate, whereas some of the bound bacterial daughters remain bound to the surface, the rest entering the exudate. Bound bacteria may be consumed and destroyed (phagocytosed) by immune cells called neutrophils, while free bacteria and inhibitors may leak out of the wound (clearance) in the first twenty-four hours after the excision is made and before a scab forms over the exposed exudate.

Image Credit: Image created by Dr. Paul A. Roberts.

Image Link

Funding:
PAR, EK, AMK and SJ gratefully acknowledge support from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. PAR and SJ would also like to thank the Wellcome Trust for funding a parameterisation workshop at the University of Birmingham (UK). RMH acknowledges support from the Golden Charity Guild Charles R. Baxter, MD Chair in Burn Surgery, which provided research funding. AMK thanks the UT System for support through a University of Texas System Science and Technology Acquisition and Retention (STARs) Program award. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

For further information
Kate Chapple, Press Office, University of Birmingham, tel + 44 (0)121 414 2772 or + 44 (0)789 921164.