Mortality rate 'weekend effect' not a reliable measure of care quality in hospitals

The study found mortality rates vary depending on whether admission to hospital at the weekend was an emergency, maternity or elective

The higher mortality rate for weekend hospital admissions should not be used as an indicator of quality of care due to the lack of data on the severity of patient illness preceding hospital admission, finds a new study by the University of Birmingham and the University of Warwick.

The study found there is a 16% higher chance of mortality for weekend hospital admissions compared with weekday admissions, but rates vary depending on whether admission was emergency, maternity or elective (i.e. surgery).

The study was undertaken as part of the High-intensity Specialist-Led Acute Care (HiSLAC) project, which is a collaboration led by the University of Birmingham and funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). HiSLAC brings together a collaboration of patients, clinicians, researchers and policy-makers across the NHS to contribute to the evaluation of aspects of NHS England's 7-Day Service programme.

The study is the largest review of the scientific literature on the ‘weekend effect’ to date and is published today in BMJ Open.

The researchers examined 68 previous studies, covering data from over 640 million hospital admissions across the world. They concluded that, contrary to commonly held assumptions, the higher death rates amongst patients admitted to hospital at weekends are unlikely to reflect in-hospital quality of care, and may be attributed to differential criteria for admitting patients and other factors in the community preceding hospital admission.

While hospital mortality was found to be 16% higher for weekend admissions compared with weekday admissions on average, the researchers noticed that such a ‘weekend effect’ varied by type of admissions, with the effect being most pronounced for elective admissions and almost absent for maternity admissions.

More importantly, they found that the urgency and frailty of patients at the time of admission, which can influence their risk of death, has not been adequately taken into account in most studies that they reviewed. In a small number of studies where these factors were better controlled for, the apparent weekend effect tends to diminish.

Recent years have seen a focus on increased staffing as a solution to the ‘weekend effect’. The researchers found little association between weekend-weekday differences in staffing level and weekend-weekday differences in hospital mortality in the small number of studies that looked into this, and suggest that there are other factors affecting the mortality that should be investigated further.

University of Birmingham Professor Julian Bion, Principal Investigator of the HiSLAC project, stated: “Fewer patients are admitted to hospital at weekends, and their profiles are different from those admitted during weekdays: they are sicker, and more of them require admission directly to intensive care.

“It is also likely that elective admissions, usually for surgical operations, at weekends are those with more urgent problems and more complicated issues, which will contribute to the higher mortality. These factors seem to explain much of the higher mortality risk among weekend admissions.

“This means that the search for the cause of the weekend effect should include examination of the whole patient pathway, particularly health services in the community. For example, we know that at weekends patients are much less likely to be referred by a general practitioner before coming to hospital.

“The bottom line is, do not be deterred or delayed by the apparent ‘weekend effect’ if you need health care at weekends; and provide feedback on your care experience to the staff or the NHS whether positive or negative, at weekdays or weekends.”

Dr Yen-Fu Chen, lead author of the literature review and an Associate Professor from the University of Warwick, added: “We have some evidence that the higher mortality associated with weekend admissions is because weekend patients are sicker when they are admitted into the hospital; but evidence regarding whether these patients receive inferior care following admission compared with those admitted on weekdays is sparse and somewhat conflicting.

“The estimated death rate following hospital admission can be influenced by many different factors, such as patient’s condition when admitted, the quality of care he or she received during hospital stay, as well as issues related to discharge arrangement and how data surrounding the admission were recorded.

“This means that the ‘signal’ of hospital mortality rate is obscured by ‘noise’ from other factors and is unlikely to be an accurate measure of quality of care during the admission.

“More evidence from objective measurement of the care quality and processes, along with patients’ and carers’ accounts of the care that they experienced, are also crucial. We are collecting and analysing additional data on these issues as part of the HiSLAC project.”


Ends

For more information please contact:

  1. Emma McKinney, Communications Manager (Health Sciences), University of Birmingham, tel: +44 (0) 121 414 6681, or contact the press office out of hours on +44 (0) 7789 921 165.
  2. Peter Thorley, Media Relations Manager (Warwick Medical School and Department of Physics) Tel: +44 (0)24 761 50868, Mob: +44 (0) 7824 540863.


Notes to editors:

  • The University of Birmingham is ranked amongst the world’s top 100 institutions. Its work brings people from across the world to Birmingham, including researchers, teachers and more than 6,500 international students from over 150 countries.
  • Chen et al (2019). ‘The magnitude and modifiers of the weekend effect in hospital admissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis’. BMJ Open. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025764
  • These findings are from the final phase of a five-year study. HiSLAC is an independent research collaboration funded by the National Institute for Health Research and based at the University of Birmingham. HiSLAC is supported or endorsed by NHS England, NHS Confederation, Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, College of Emergency Medicine, Society of Acute Medicine, Royal College of Physicians, Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal College of Anaesthetists, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, the Universities of Birmingham, Leicester and Warwick and by the leadership of 127 NHS Trusts in England. For more information and updates on HiSLAC visit the website www.hislac.org or follow the study on Twitter @HiSLACProject.
  • The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) is the nation's largest funder of health and care research. The NIHR:
  1. Funds, supports and delivers high quality research that benefits the NHS, public health and social care
  2. Engages and involves patients, carers and the public in order to improve the reach, quality and impact of research
  3. Attracts, trains and supports the best researchers to tackle the complex health and care challenges of the future
  4. Invests in world-class infrastructure and a skilled delivery workforce to translate discoveries into improved treatments and services
  5. Partners with other public funders, charities and industry to maximise the value of research to patients and the economy
  • The NIHR was established in 2006 to improve the health and wealth of the nation through research, and is funded by the Department of Health and Social Care. In addition to its national role, the NIHR commissions applied health research to benefit the poorest people in low- and middle-income countries, using Official Development Assistance funding.
  • This work uses data provided by patients and collected by the NHS as part of their care and support and would not have been possible without access to this data. The NIHR recognises and values the role of patient data, securely accessed and stored, both in underpinning and leading to improvements in research and care. www.nihr.ac.uk/patientdata