Precarious work, precarious assets: gig-work in the asset welfare state

Household finances are increasingly challenged by two competing logics – the fragmentation of work and the emergence of the asset-welfare state.

Many workers are no longer guaranteed a stable, ongoing source of income and instead must turn to a patchwork of short-term or low-paid self-employed work to make ends meet.  Alongside a rise in precarious work has been the transformation of the welfare state from a wage-earner’s welfare state to the asset-based welfare that is premised on securing access to and preserving the value of assets (i.e. property, retirement funds etc.).  In the asset-based welfare state, households are expected to facilitate their own security via their assets in the absence of previous state expenditures, such as unemployment, healthcare, or education.

Emerging out of these co-existing forces is a contradictory logic where household are expected to secure themselves a stream of income to service the debt obligation necessary for accumulating these assets, while the stability of this income is challenged by precarious working conditions.  This has ultimately led to rising inequality between households that have the income to service asset accumulation compared with households whose precarious jobs lead to challenges in securing access to assets and uncertainty in maintaining them.

Research objectives

This is no better illustrated than by the gig-worker. The rising figure of contemporary work whose bicycles weave through our cities securing their income streams through the fragmented labour assigned to them by apps on their mobile phones. This project therefore seeks to understand how the experience of gig-work interacts with the expectations of the asset-welfare state and what this means for gig-workers’ perceptions of long-term security.

To gain insight into these social dynamics, the research team will employ a mixed methodology of an online questionnaire and semi-structured interview with 25 gig-workers living in the West Midlands.

Outputs and impact

In addition to academic (e.g. journal articles) and non-academic outputs (e.g. a summary/policy report), the research team will organise and attend conference presentations, seminars, or workshops to disseminate the findings to relevant audiences (e.g. via CHASM, employment, or finance sector-organised events, or national and international academic conferences).

Partner organisations and sponsors

This research is funded by the Centre on Household Assets and Savings Management (CHASM)