A Generational Step-Change? The Rail Delivery Group's Proposals for a New Railway

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the University of Birmingham

“One major RDG proposal is for an “independent organising body” that will reduce political interference, better coordinate track and train, and hold operators to account.”  

Hide

Increasing fares, delays and standing room only. Does the railway represent value for money? Yet another review has been announced, this time root and branch.1 Consultation is ongoing but the RDG’s response has attracted media attention.2

(1) Customer-focused public service concessions

One major proposal is to replace franchises with concessions. The arguments for introducing more concessions are not new.3 Franchises were originally intended to give private sector operators flexibility to design services; however, the Government has increasingly prescribed service specifications leaving limited scope for innovation. Operators have also borne unmanageable risks e.g. to generate revenue against exogenous factors outside their control. More recently, concessions have been successfully trialled as part of devolved strategies for regional rail. The London Overground is an example by which TfL pays the operator a fee to provide services and who does not bear revenue risk. However, the Railways Act 1993 continues to treat such concessions as legal exceptions.

The RDG proposes two types. The first is a TfL-style gross-cost concession awarded by a national/regional/local authority to an operator but under a single unified transport brand to maximise accountability. Unlike a franchise, the authority simply pays the price for running a service with no or little transfer of revenue risk. This is envisaged for commuter routes where there is little choice but to use the train and customers demand a standard service. The second is a ‘customer outcome-based’ net-cost contract involving a balance of risk and reward between the authority and operator. This is envisaged for markets (including long distance journeys) where there is competition with other forms of transport, different reasons for travel e.g. leisure and, thus, scope for tailoring outcomes to more diverse customer preferences.

However, the proposals remain unclear about how risk will be allocated. For instance, the RDG proposes that arrangements should not be “weighed down with inflexible contractual requirements” and should be “altered to suit new conditions”. The legal risk and commercial uncertainty of modifying contracts is not addressed. There is also an unresolved question about how these concessions will be regulated. Research has shown that the Railways Act 1993 can facilitate deregulation to ensure regional autonomy but at the expense of subjecting concessions to continuing centralised control not dissimilar to franchises.4 There is also a need to ensure consistency and accountability of provision across regions.

(2) “Independent organising body”

Recent franchise fiascos have highlighted the difficulty of pinpointing who is responsible for procurement and management failures across the DfT, Network Rail, operators and other bodies with overlapping remits. One major RDG proposal is for an “independent organising body” that will reduce political interference, better coordinate track and train, and hold operators to account.

It is argued that this body is not feasible as its proposed functions are too diffuse to coordinate. For instance, it is proposed to combine certain functions of existing bodies,5 covering everything from coordinating investment and network capacity to overseeing major procurement and applying penalties. These functions even go beyond those of the Strategic Rail Authority which, it is recalled, had an uneasy relationship with the regulator before its abolition in 2006. Practically, it is also unclear how this body will be given more capacity than the DfT’s limited capacity as a “systems integrator”. This would also inevitably require complex legislation to delimit its powers relative to other bodies. Perhaps debate should equally focus on reform of existing bodies.

Rail Regulation Research

The RDG’s proposals raise many questions about the regulatory design of rail services. There is considerable potential for research on rail regulation to illuminate the challenges and opportunities for delivering this vital public service.

References:

  1. Read more details on the Williams Rail Review. See L. R. A. Butler, Evidence to the Williams Rail Review, 12/02/19 (on franchise procurement). Professor Tony Prosser (University of Bristol), has also submitted evidence based on co-authored research concerning the role of competition and concessions.
  2. Rail Delivery Group, “Changing Track, Proposals for a more customer-focussed, joined-up and accountable railway”, 30 April 2019.
  3. See T Prosser and L Butler, ‘Rail Franchises, Competition and Public Service’ (2018) 81(1) Modern Law Review 23-50 and citations therein.
  4. L.R.A. Butler, ‘An Inspection of Rail Franchise Procurement: First-Class Regulation for Privatised Passenger Rail?’ (2018) 27(6) Public Procurement Law Review 251-278.
  5. Those listed include the DfT, the Office of Rail and Road, the RDG, Network Rail, the Rail Standards and Safety Board, the National Skills Academy for Rail and Transport Focus. However, not all relevant bodies are listed but which also require consideration e.g. certain functions of the Competition and Markets Authority.

Have your say...

Feedback
  • roblox robux
    External
    1. At 4:55AM on 17 June 2021, wrote

    There are the wonderfull blog online it is the very nice to share the information to site of free robux roblox online game it is the great fun to all of you here.

  • Charly Rich
    External
    2. At 5:46PM on 23 July 2021, Charly Rich wrote

    I have thought so many times of entering the blogging world as I love reading them. I think I finally have the courage to give it a try. Thank you so much for all of the ideas!

  • Paul
    External
    3. At 3:49PM on 29 July 2021, wrote

    More students are seeking some independent academic writing dedicated to independent academic help in composing essays. This is because many students find the concept of "best" hard to understand, and it is one of those concepts that seems to be at the root of much of the confusion about essay writing on campus. I know this first hand because I am a college student myself (and a proud, hard-working college student), and I have often had to explain what "best" means to me. It is certainly an interesting concept and I hope one day I will become more knowledgeable about it, but for now, let me try to make some sense of it here.

  • Mitra Surik
    External
    4. At 2:01AM on 17 September 2021, Mitra Surik wrote

    I can also say that it's important to produce something creative. Because I already know from my own experience, of course, that you have to think about creativity in the production of clothing. Design is what attracts the consumer. So I was looking for where to find interesting prints for T-shirts. I found some good samples https://masterbundles.com/best-t-shirts/ and already thanks to these findings created their prints. So I recommend everyone to have a look and to check it out!

  • Barbara Moriggan
    External
    5. At 11:38PM on 03 October 2021, Barbara Moriggan wrote

    When I talk about the past, I always think of religion. I recently wrote an essay on the New Testament, and I used this resource - https://blablawriting.net/essay-examples/new-testament. It helped me write a good student paper, for which I got the highest score.

  •  www.cryotherapyknoxvilletn.com
    External
    6. At 2:04AM on 04 December 2021, wrote

    Impressive strategies

Add Your Feedback