A Movement Rises from a Murder: The George Floyd Protests

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the University of Birmingham

“The marchers are not the monsters at our doors. They are the seekers of a better way.”


The US is a wounded country.

America's political culture is polarized, with shouting too often pushing out dialogue. The economic recovery since the Great Recession of 2008 has not included everybody, and is now swept away by a Coronavirus which has already claimed more than 106,000 lives. The man in the White House is more concerned about his ego, tearing down the system in the process, rather than serving the population. The Statue of Liberty no longer offers sanctuary, including for the tired, hungry, and poor.

But in dusk, even a dusk covered with the smoke of conflict and abuses of power, is there the possibility of a dawn? That brings us to the George Floyd Protests.

The Seekers of a Better Way

The murder of George Floyd at the hands of police in Minneapolis did not launch racial injustice and violence in America. These have been ingrained in the country since its founding in the 18th century. The Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s brought advances, but not the full, necessary remedies. The Los Angeles uprising of 1992, following the beating of Rodney King by police officers, did not lead to the re-examination that was needed throughout American society.

Far from living up to the cultural ideal of opportunity for all, America has been the site of increasing economic inequality since the 1980s. The devastation of Hurricane Katrina in 2005 exposed the division and deprivation as the head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Michael Brown, said, "We're seeing people that we didn't know exist." The ongoing killings of unarmed African Americans, even with the first African American as US President, led to the Black Lives Matter movement in 2014.

What is different in 2020 is that the man in the White House is not only willing but dedicated to exploitation of the racial tensions. For Donald Trump, the priority is whether he can strike a get-tough pose, both for his self-image and for his re-election in November. With social media, he can send out a shock wave in seconds: "when the looting starts, the shooting starts"; protesters as "THUGS" to be met with "vicious dogs" and "ominous weapons"; the US military on the streets.

Even if Trump is covering up his insecurity and weakness, already magnified by the Coronavirus pandemic, he and his advisors set the trap. Make them the center of attention, and their declaration of demonstrations as "Antifa" and "extremists" buries the reality of the past and the present, of killings from Greenwood 1921 to Emmett Till 1955 to Walter Scott 2015 to George Floyd 2020, of the everyday struggle for recognition and respect. They have a ready, if unwitting accomplice, in headlines and breaking news that thrive on an image of confrontation: the police charge, the burning building, the looted store.

For the large majority of these protests are peaceful. The marchers are not the monsters at our doors. They are the seekers of a better way, the cries for a dialogue that is not overwhelmed by scare-mongering, for an economy and society that does not treat some of its people as expendable in education, health care, and the job market. They are the pleas to finally hear, across all aspects of life, "I can't breathe."

And despite Trump, despite the pernicious caricatures on some US outlets, they are being heard. Almost 65% of Americans are "sympathetic" to the demonstrations. Presumptive Democratic Presidential nominee Joe Biden spoke eloquently on Monday of "fear and uncertainty in the country…after generation after generation after generation of hurt inflicted on people of color”. While some police officers have wielded batons and fired bullets, others - including the chief of police in Lexington, Kentucky, where my grandfather served for 34 years - have knelt with protesters in a show of reconciliation.

But this cannot just be a moment of white privilege with We Notice You. This cannot just be a reflex against the wannabe autocracy of Trump. It must be a process of beginning to learn, beginning to understand. It must not be an impulse to speak, but to listen. It must be a lasting commitment, not a brief high-profile moment, to work together for lasting change in a system and institutions long on the motto of "And Justice for All" and short on its implementation.

"The Arc of The Moral Universe"

In March 1968, during another time of turmoil, Martin Luther King spoke of "The Other America" and the search for "genuine equality". 

"It's much easier to integrate a lunch counter than it is to guarantee a livable income and a good solid job. It's much easier to guarantee the right to vote than it is to guarantee the right to live in sanitary, decent housing conditions. It is much easier to integrate a public park than it is to make genuine, quality, integrated education a reality."

But with all the challenges of racism, of fear, of deprivation, King concluded, "We shall overcome because the arc of the moral universe is long but it bends toward Justice." Twenty-five days later, he was assassinated in Memphis, Tennessee. The Civil Rights Movement's march was not completed in an America stretched to breaking point during the Vietnam War. Another tough-pose President, Richard Nixon, took office and replaced the demonstrations with a mythical "silent majority".

King's arc seemed to have bent backwards. More than 40 years later, as President Barack Obama had the quote woven into an Oval Office rug, was it a hope sealed away under our feet rather than the goal just ahead of us?

Filmed in real time, George Floyd's murder is now an iconic symbol of violence, alongside the "Strange Fruit" in the Southern trees, the marchers beset by water cannons and vicious dogs in Birmingham, Alamaba and the Michael Browns and Eric Garners killed far beyond the South. His murder is a symbol of the everyday brutality of discrimination and inequality.

But his death is also an opening for an ever-present will and opportunity: to return the arc to the right direction.

Turning it towards the sign held by the small boy in one rally, "Am I Next?". Turning it towards the lines of marchers taking a knee in front of the police in riot-control ranks. Turning it towards all those, crossing lines of color, religion, and class, who are calling out that Black Lives Matter.

© Photo by Rosa Pineda

Have your say...

  • Ian Coleman
    1. At 4:57PM on 15 September 2020, Ian Coleman wrote

    Right now it is looking doubtful that Derek Chauvin can be convicted. There is reasonable doubt that Chauvin's actions really did kill Floyd. Floyd, despite his protestations that he couldn't breathe, can clearly be seen in the video to be breathing. Also he could talk. He could push air through his larynx. He died. not of asphyxiation, but of a heart attack, exacerbated by a drug overdose. That is a plausible theory, and it will be enough to acquit Chauvin.

    Also, Chauvin use of the neck restraint was legal and an allowed restraint protocol. George Floyd really did resist arrest. Floyd died of a heart attack during the progress of a lawful arrest, and as an accidental result of legally sanctioned action by the police.

    The police were not arresting Floyd for passing a bad twenty dollar bill, but for endangering public safety by operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of drugs.

    Chauvin is being held under a punitively high bail, and he won't come to trial for many months. If he is acquitted, he will have grounds for a lawsuit for wrongful imprisonment. This could play out for years.

    George Floyd has now become something of martyr in the eyes of many people, but this is a story that looks increasingly absurd. He was not Medgar Evers or Rosa Parks, but an ex-con who died of a drug overdose-induced heart attack while he was resisting arrest. That is a reasonable interpretation of events.

  • Ian Coleman
    2. At 2:13AM on 04 April 2021, Ian Coleman wrote

    It is nearly six months since I made my original post predicting that Derek Chauvin would be acquitted and now, a week into the presentation of the prosecution's case, and having heard the opening statements of the defense, I am confident that I was correct.

    My point now is that it is extremely dangerous to load political freight onto an incident about which little is known in its early stages. Like most people, I thought when the story first broke that Derek Chauvin had strangled George Floyd. Chauvin has been essentially exonerated by the coroner's report, which expressly states that there was no physical evidence that Floyd died of traumatic asphyxiation. He died of cardiac arrest, for which he was highly susceptible already, and he had potentially lethal amounts of drugs in his system. I suspect that the medical examiner ruled that Floyd's death was a homicide, not because that was where the facts led, but because the feared the public outrage if he had cleared the police outright.

    Derek Chauvin is now being tried under strict rules of evidence, and is being defended by a knowledgeable and vigorous attorney. The judge will allow the defense to present evidence that Floyd had been arrested in 2019 and, on that occasion, swallowed drugs to conceal them from the arresting officers. This testimony will make it starkly clear that Floyd poisoned himself to death in 2020, and the officers' only fault was that they didn't realize this until it was too late to save him. That's the way to bet.

  •  permanent eyelash extensions san antonio
    3. At 8:15AM on 02 December 2021, wrote

    The whole world is wounded

  •  eyelash lift san francisco
    4. At 8:16AM on 02 December 2021, wrote

    very knowledgeable

Add Your Feedback